Home News Iain Macwhirter: Enoch Powell would be proud of Britain in 2018
News

Iain Macwhirter: Enoch Powell would be proud of Britain in 2018

xriversidemuseum r
xriversidemuseum

“Computer says no.” These three words, often delivered with a blank stare from an immigration official, mark the beginning of a Kafkaesque nightmare for many British citizens. It’s a phrase that encapsulates the cold, impersonal nature of a system that seems more concerned with ticking boxes than understanding the human lives it impacts. For some, this bureaucratic indifference spirals into life-altering consequences. People who have lived in the UK their entire lives find themselves detained, denied essential healthcare like cancer treatment, refused housing, stripped of their careers, and even deported to countries they’ve never known as adults.

The roots of this issue trace back to the UK’s increasingly rigid immigration policies, which have been criticised for prioritising paperwork over people. Experts argue that the system’s reliance on digital checks and inflexible rules often fails to account for complex individual circumstances. As Iain Macwhirter noted in his Herald Scotland article, the current approach echoes the divisive rhetoric of figures like Enoch Powell, raising questions about how far society has truly progressed since the 1960s.

One of the most troubling aspects is the system’s inability to distinguish between genuine errors and deliberate fraud. For example, individuals who’ve lived in the UK for decades but lack specific documentation can find themselves classified as “illegal” overnight. This has led to cases where people have been denied access to life-saving medical treatments, evicted from their homes, or separated from their families. The psychological toll of such experiences is immense, with many reporting feelings of helplessness and betrayal by a country they call home.

Immigration lawyers and advocacy groups have repeatedly called for reforms to make the system more humane and responsive. They argue that a fairer process would involve caseworkers being given the discretion to consider individual circumstances, rather than relying solely on automated checks. As one legal expert put it, “When a computer becomes the final arbiter of someone’s fate, we risk losing sight of the very humanity we’re meant to protect.”

For those affected, the message is clear: the current system is broken, and the human cost is too high. If you or someone you know is navigating this labyrinth, it’s essential to seek legal advice early and ensure all documentation is meticulously maintained. While the system may feel overwhelming, understanding your rights and gathering evidence can make a critical difference.

Related Articles

angela scanlon
News

Angela Scanlon Joins Strictly Come Dancing 2025 with Carlos Gu

Discover Angela Scanlon's exciting debut on Strictly Come Dancing 2023, paired with...

GettyImages
News

Edinburgh Castle Ranked Top Proposal Spot in Scotland – Daily Record

Discover the top global destinations for marriage proposals, including Edinburgh Castle in...

Rutherglen and Hamilton West By election
News

Rutherglen & Hamilton West By-Election Results 2025 – Glasgow News

An aggregate of 30,531 votes were counted in the Rutherglen & Hamilton...

Image jpeg
News

Fire and Assault at Glasgow Flats Under Police Investigation

Damage from a fire at Heathfield Road An intense fire and a...